Home Blog Page 10

Top 10 tips to manage your money when you inherit

0

Coming into money is not something that happens often but it does happen. 

You could win the lottery, a wealthy aunt could pass away and leave you with a generous cash sum in inheritance, you could be recipient of a larger than expected work bonus or you earn some money from the sale of a company.

Before you commit yourself to spending, investing, giving gifts or even giving up your job, it makes sense to take some time to consider your financial situation and your options.

Paying off outstanding debts and bolstering the rainy day fund are among a number of ways in which people who unexpectedly come into money can utilise their windfall

Remember, long-term financial planning starts with knowing where you stand with your money. So here are some tips on making your windfall work for you in the long run.

Make a plan

The shock of a sudden windfall can set off a litany of irrational behaviours, such as giving all the money away, becoming a recluse, spending the money lavishly, or hiding or hoarding the money.

First, stop, take a deep breath and picture how you would like your life to look in five, ten, and maybe even 20 or 30 years. Where are you living? Are you retired? Travelling the world? Still working, but with less financial stress? Jot down your visions so you can keep that picture clear.

RELATED ARTICLES

Previous
1
Next


Where to invest your cash after the election: Experts tip…


Robots, obesity, old age… even biblical values – whatever…


The 20 investment trusts that raised dividend payouts every…


Investing Show: Should you invest in India? We ask the…

Share this article

Share
36 shares

HOW THIS IS MONEY CAN HELP

How to choose the best (and cheapest) DIY investing Isa – and our pick of the platforms

Setting some goals drives your decisions about what to do with your windfall. With a direction in mind, you can plan more effectively.

Consider working with an expert; whether that’s a financial adviser, accountant or tax expert. You want the right type of professional for your situation. Depending on the size or complexity of your windfall, you may even need a team of experts.

A ‘dumpster fire’ in tech could scorch investors, money manager warns

0

 

show chapters

A 'dumpster fire' in tech could scorch investors, money manager warns

A ‘dumpster fire’ may be brewing in big tech, $2.5B fund manager warns   

Big tech’s hot streak may be officially going up in flames, according to Mayflower Advisors’ Larry Glazer.

Glazer, a portfolio manager with $2.5 billion in assets under management, believes some of the biggest tech names are in a danger zone.

Apple Introduces Apple Watch Series 3

0

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Aliquam eros ante, placerat ac pulvinar at, iaculis a quam. Duis ut risus lobortis diam molestie vehicula. Nunc aliquet lectus at egestas tristique. Orci varius natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus. Ut commodo vel quam sit amet aliquam. Nulla facilisi. Sed enim libero, pellentesque euismod hendrerit sed, vestibulum nec mi. Integer aliquam purus blandit eleifend auctor. Maecenas porttitor eros at pulvinar lobortis. Donec arcu ante, fringilla id orci id, dignissim mollis sapien. Aenean vehicula justo mauris, eget interdum turpis dapibus a.

Quisque massa mauris, imperdiet in nisl vitae, mollis faucibus enim. Suspendisse mollis tempus enim, id tincidunt velit lacinia eget. Nam tincidunt lorem sit amet malesuada aliquet. Morbi pellentesque pharetra turpis vel mattis. Proin vulputate aliquet tincidunt. Nulla sed urna consequat, aliquam diam in, congue metus. Nullam sit amet aliquam orci.

Donec lorem metus, pulvinar sit amet augue ut, tristique euismod neque. Nullam vitae hendrerit tellus, sit amet maximus lorem. Praesent commodo orci ut venenatis dictum. Pellentesque odio quam, rutrum a mi sed, aliquet ullamcorper ipsum. Phasellus bibendum elit ligula, sed placerat diam hendrerit non. Suspendisse commodo tempus leo at congue. Curabitur aliquet efficitur nisi, eu dignissim dui consectetur vitae. Aenean eget magna quis est tincidunt maximus. Nunc non metus vitae sem imperdiet scelerisque. Aenean egestas euismod ante, id congue ligula egestas sed. Quisque eros enim, dignissim non efficitur posuere, viverra in velit. Aliquam ac pretium sem. Suspendisse fringilla mattis orci in consequat. Mauris quis nulla sed dui volutpat semper eget at neque.

How and where to buy & sell cryptocurrencies like bitcoin

0

Recently, This is Money received an e-mail from a reader which started: ‘You need to have a section dedicated to crypto technology and currencies.

‘This is now a market exploding with ICOs, new currencies daily, technological advancements and a market worth over $550billion.

‘The technology is the biggest technological leap since the founding of the internet.’

After some research and a raft of good reviews, he plumped for Bitstamp. 

At the time of his investment, ripple was not really heard of, with only bitcoin and ethereum really in the mainstream domain, making it harder to get hold of.

However, it took some hoops to get involved. It took a week to get verified, which involved him sending a copy of passport to the Bitstamp HQ in Slovenia, along with a bank transfer, which meant having his Iban and Swift Code to hand.

He says that recently, a friend of his has also tried to sign up with Bitstamp, but the company is quoting five weeks to verify, thanks to a surge of interest.

He says his June investment saw ripple at $0.22 a coin, but this fell to $0.10 not long afterwards, testing his nerve at the very beginning.

Eventually it rose and he was confident to make another investment, in December, when the coin went to $0.38 a coin.

By mid-January, it raced to a record high near $4 a coin – and Alex said his account had grown to €34,000 (it’s measured in euros as it is Slovenian based) from roughly €4,000 invested.

He said on one train journey home, his account had collapsed from €34,000 to €25,000, as investors began to panic.

He believes the price went up after rumours that ripple was heading to Coinbase, one of the main crypto players, meaning more people could invest, thus driving up the price.

However, the firm issued a statement saying this wasn’t the case – and it lead to a bloodbath.

So, was it easy to cash out? Alex says it was. He sold 8,000XRP making a tidy profit and taking away his exposure. This was sold within seconds on the site to eager investors.

It has left him with 12,000XRP that he plans to keep hold of. Currently, it has ‘stabilised’ to around $1.15 a coin.

He says Bitstamp charge 0.24 per cent for buying and selling. The cost, he says, of selling, was €9 in fees. It was also warned that it would take up to three working days to arrive in his account. It took two.

We asked whether his bank had been in touch regarding any suspicious activity, giving the amounts of money being transferred and having been received overseas. He says he hasn’t.

A raft of case studies recently in the Financial Times revealed problems cashing out their profits, with some banks suspicious of where customers had received huge sums. 

Transferring cash and passport details to Slovenia for an investment punt is extreme – but Alex says the risk has paid dividends.

CFDS

Some websites offer investors the chance to take a punt on cryptocurrencies, but not actually own any of their own. 

Here, you buy ‘Contract For Difference’ agreements. This is where an investor and a broker agree to pay each other the difference between the price of an asset at the moment the contract is made and its later price when you decide to close it.

The Financial Conduct Authority warned against betting on the currency using CFDs in November.

They are complex financial instruments which allow novice investors to guess whether the price will go up or down.

Punters could lose up to 50 times their deposit if they get it wrong, meaning they could rapidly rack up huge debts.

The FCA said CFD traders are ‘at risk of suffering significant losses and potentially losing more than you have invested’. 

OBSCURE COINS HARDER TO BUY

Many may believe bitcoin may have peaked – or reached a point in which they cannot make some of the astronomical gains made by early investors.

As such, they want to take a ‘punt’ on a lesser known coin. There is plenty of them. 

This is Money recently signed up to New Zealand based website Cryptopia to see a list of what is available. It was huge.

Two that are being tipped to grow this year from a low level by a panel of four fintech leaders for price comparison website Finder in a cryptocurrency predictions survey are cardano (ADA) and stellar lumens (XLM).

They claim that cardano – a third generation digital currency – will rise by more than 8,000 per cent this year from $0.78 a coin to $68.

However, getting your mitts on the coin as a speculative punt is not as easy as it seems. 

Hardly any of the aforementioned brokers or wallets cater for the smaller currencies, only the main players such as bitcoin.

You then find yourself on niche websites – or in our case, Cryptopia. 

But to buy any currency on many of these types of website requires you to already own bitcoin or another major cryptocurrency. 

Or in Alex’s case above, sending bank and passport details to Slovenia, which is a hurdle many – understandably – would not be comfortable with.

When we searched ‘how to buy cardano UK’ a step-by-step guide said we needed to download software for the wallet and own ethereum to get the coin. 

We’re not sure how many people would be comfortable downloading software onto their computers or phones from sources they do not know. It is open to all sorts of fraudulent activity. 

DO YOU DECLARE PROFITS TO THE TAXMAN? 

Those who have made profits from buying and selling digital currencies may be left a little confused about whether or not they need to pay tax.

With the deadline for tax returns fast approaching, many may not know whether or not to declare it – and the HMRC guidelines are a little fuzzy.

The last time it issued guidance on the taxation of cryptocurrencies was March 2014, which feels like a lifetime ago in the world of fast moving digital currencies.

So is it an investment meaning Capital Gains Tax is payable on gains above £11,300? This is 18 per cent for basic-rate income tax payers and 28 per cent for higher-rate taxpayers.

Or should it be treated as gambling, which means profits are tax-free?  

An HMRC spokesman says: ‘We don’t normally tax betting and gambling because it is usually not classed as trading income. 

‘But there may be circumstances where factors such as the degree of skill and organisation would make the activity more likely to be taxable as trading income. Each case will depend on its own facts.’ 

Tesla’s junk bond tanks to 87 cents on the dollar after downgrade

0

Tesla's junk bond tanks to 87 cents on the dollar after downgrade

Robert Ferris | CNBC
A Tesla Model 3 on display at a showroom in New York on Jan. 18th, 2018.

Tesla’s bond price plunged Wednesday to its lowest level since the note was issued last year, sending its yield above 7 percent.

 

The price drop came a day after Moody’s Investors Services cut Tesla’s credit rating and changed its outlook to negative, citing doubts about the company’s Model 3 production schedule. The credit rating company said the electric car maker will likely have to raise money in the future to meet cash needs.

The falling price of the bond and surging yield means it will be more costly for Tesla to raise funds in the debt market.

Moody’s downgrades Tesla credit rating on Model 3 production delays

0

Moody's downgrades Tesla credit rating on Model 3 production delays

FilmMagic | HBO | Getty Images
Elon Musk speaks on stage during the Westworld Featured Session during SXSW at Austin Convention Center on March 10, 2018 in Austin, Texas.

Moody’s downgraded Tesla’s credit ratings Tuesday and changed its outlook to negative from stable, citing “significant shortfall” in the Model 3 production rate and a tight financial situation.

 

The credit ratings agency also said the electric car maker will likely need to raise more money in the near future to meet its cash needs and maintain its expected pace of expansion.

Moody’s lowered its corporate family rating on Tesla to B3 from B2 and downgraded its rating on the company’s senior notes to Caa1 from B3. The speculative grade liquidity rating was cut to SGL-4 from SGL-3.

Hong Kong protest leaders warn of threat to civil rights

0

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Aliquam eros ante, placerat ac pulvinar at, iaculis a quam. Duis ut risus lobortis diam molestie vehicula. Nunc aliquet lectus at egestas tristique. Orci varius natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus. Ut commodo vel quam sit amet aliquam. Nulla facilisi. Sed enim libero, pellentesque euismod hendrerit sed, vestibulum nec mi. Integer aliquam purus blandit eleifend auctor. Maecenas porttitor eros at pulvinar lobortis. Donec arcu ante, fringilla id orci id, dignissim mollis sapien. Aenean vehicula justo mauris, eget interdum turpis dapibus a.

Quisque massa mauris, imperdiet in nisl vitae, mollis faucibus enim. Suspendisse mollis tempus enim, id tincidunt velit lacinia eget. Nam tincidunt lorem sit amet malesuada aliquet. Morbi pellentesque pharetra turpis vel mattis. Proin vulputate aliquet tincidunt. Nulla sed urna consequat, aliquam diam in, congue metus. Nullam sit amet aliquam orci.

Donec lorem metus, pulvinar sit amet augue ut, tristique euismod neque. Nullam vitae hendrerit tellus, sit amet maximus lorem. Praesent commodo orci ut venenatis dictum. Pellentesque odio quam, rutrum a mi sed, aliquet ullamcorper ipsum. Phasellus bibendum elit ligula, sed placerat diam hendrerit non. Suspendisse commodo tempus leo at congue. Curabitur aliquet efficitur nisi, eu dignissim dui consectetur vitae. Aenean eget magna quis est tincidunt maximus. Nunc non metus vitae sem imperdiet scelerisque. Aenean egestas euismod ante, id congue ligula egestas sed. Quisque eros enim, dignissim non efficitur posuere, viverra in velit. Aliquam ac pretium sem. Suspendisse fringilla mattis orci in consequat. Mauris quis nulla sed dui volutpat semper eget at neque.

Deutsche Bank, in search of new CEO, asked Goldman’s Gnodde

0
Deutsche Bank, in search of new CEO, asked Goldman's Gnodde

Kai Pfaffenbach | Reuters
2016A statue is seen next to the logo of Germany's Deutsche Bank in Frankfurt, Germany.

Deutsche Bank approached Goldman Sachs international chief Richard Gnodde to ask if he would be interested in taking the helm of the German lender, but the executive turned it down, according to a source close to him.

Market analyst Sam Stovall sees ‘at least one more’ big stock drop this year

0
show chapters

Market analyst Sam Stovall sees 'at least one more' big stock drop this year

Strategist: Volatility is not quite over yet   

The stock market could see at least one more big fall this year, after the S&P 500’s more than 10 percent retreat in early February, veteran strategist Sam Stovall told CNBC on Wednesday.

 

“We need to go down a bit more,” Stovall, chief investment strategist at CRFA, said on “Squawk Alley.” “If we do end up getting back to break even before going deeper than the 10.2 percent decline, I think we have at least one more of these kind of declines this year.”

“Forty percent of all declines of 5 percent or more in one year were followed up by more than one later in that year,” he added.

The 14 best UK income funds revealed

0

Investing in UK income funds is a hugely popular among  British investors, whether they are looking to draw on the dividends or compound them up to grow their wealth.

Picking the best income fund can be a tough choice though, especially as many rely on a few big FTSE 100 dividend-payers. In a bid to help investors separate the wheat from chaff, investment firm Sanlam UK publishes a half-yearly report revealing the best and worst UK-centric income funds.

The study, which has been running for over three decades, reviews and tracks the performance of all funds in the the Investment Association UK Equity Income sector over a six-month period to the end of June and splits them into three categories: the White List, the Grey List and the Black List.

Funds on the top band White List have demonstrated they can deliver strong total returns over the last five years

1. CF Miton UK Multi Cap Income 

Ongoing charges: 0.81 per cent

Yield: 4.1 per cent

Volatility: 7.9 per cent

The CF Miton UK Multi Cap Income  has maintained the number one spot six months on from the previous iteration of the income study – despite a slight fall in yield by 0.4 percentage point to 4.1 per cent. It invests mainly in UK shares although the fund has little exposure to other assets including European shares and UK bonds.

Sanlam said: ‘Combining consistently strong returns, low volatility and delivering a high income pay-out for the period reviewed, the fund is substantially ahead of its peers in terms of meeting the requirements set out in the study for income investors.’

A £100 investment over five years would have yielded an income of £31.90.

HOW THE RANKINGS WORK 

To determine the best and worst performing funds, the study looked at the capital growth of each fund, absolute income – or income after the fund’s costs are taken into account – and volatility on a five-year basis. 

It calculates volatility by looking at how much a fund’s return each month for five years differs from its overall average return.

This is known as five-year standard deviation and the figure is provided to Sanlam by investment research firm Morningstar. The figure is not annualised and is based upon monthly total return figures over five years.

2. Slater Income

Ongoing charges: 0.81 per cent

Yield: 4.7 per cent

Volatility: 9.6 per cent

Mark Slater and Barrie Newton hold the reins to the Slater Income which targets an increasing level of income as well as long-term capital growth. Among its top holdings are staple dividend stock Phoenix Group and tobacco company Imperial Brands.

On a £100 investment, the fund would have given you £30.40 over five years. 

3. MI Chelverton UK Equity Income

Ongoing charges: 0.89 per cent

Yield: 4 per cent

Volatility: 11.5 per cent

The MI Chelverton UK Equity Income fund has risen from the lowest position on the White List in the last study to rank third. It also boasts the highest income return of the funds on the list. The fund seeks to unearth stocks in the UK AIM sector with the potential to pay out a growing level of income.

Smaller firms run a greater risk of going bust than large ones so there is a heightened risk here. 

An investment of £100 over five years would have generated £35.30 in income.

4. Marlborough Multi Cap Income 

Ongoing charges: 0.80 per cent

Yield: 4.4 per cent

Volatility: 10.1 per cent 

The Marlborough Multi Cap Income fund has climbed four positions since the last study. It invests in higher risk small and medium-sized companies – predominately where both capital and dividend growth are anticipated.

The fund is a fairly diversified portfolio with over 100 holdings including specialist asset manager Intermediate Capital Group, WHSmiths and SSE which are among the top ten.

It would have produced income of £32.10 on a £100 investment over five years. 

Free investing guides

5. Majedie UK Income

Ongoing charges: 0.77 per cent

Yield: 4.6 per cent

Volatility: 10.2 per cent

The Majedie UK Income fund has also climbed up the rankings since its last outing. It now holds fifth position on the White List – up from tenth six month earlier. It seeks to root out undervalued companies with a focus on those which are able to provide a growing level of income. The fund’s top three holdings are comprised of the usual suspects for income:  Legal & General, HSBC and BP.

A £100 investment over five years would have generated an income of £30.90.

6. Premier Monthly Income

Ongoing charges: 0.92 per cent

Yield: 4.6 per cent

Volatility: 9.6 per cent

The Premier Monthly Income has been promoted from the Grey List to the top band. It aims to give investors rising level of dividends paid monthly. The bulk of the fund is comprised of FTSE 100 conglomerates which are renowned for delivering increasing levels of income. These include HSBC, Royal Dutch Shell and BP.

You would have received  £30.90 income on a £100 investment over five years.

Neil Woodford denies conspiring to ‘injure’ infrastructure firm Stobart

0

Britain’s best known fund manager Neil Woodford has denied being involved in a conspiracy to ‘injure’ infrastructure company Stobart Group.

Woodford, founder of Woodford Investment Management, told the High Court on Monday that he was ‘shocked’ at allegations made by Stobart Group bosses.

He told Judge Jonathan Russen that allegations he conspired with Stobart’s former chief executive Andrew Tinkler were ‘completely unfounded’.

Neil Woodford has denied being involved in a conspiracy to ‘injure’ infrastructure company Stobart Group.

Bosses at the Stobart Group, which began life when founder Eddie Stobart went into business as an agricultural contractor in Cumbria in the 1960s, have sued Tinkler over claims he conspired with other businessmen to harm the company’s interests.

There is also a dispute over money spent on air travel, and Stobart bosses have requested a judge rule that Tinkler was lawfully dismissed.

RELATED ARTICLES

Previous
1
Next


Fund manager Neil Woodford sells an estimated £1.4bn in…


Former Stobart boss denies claims he conspired against…

Share this article

Share

Tinkler, who was chief executive between 2007 and 2017 denies any wrongdoing, saying he was removed from his post unfairly, and has counter-claimed.

In a written witness statement given to the judge Woodford said: ‘I am shocked to see that Stobart has chosen to make allegations that I was a party to a ‘conspiracy’ to use ‘unlawful means’ to ‘injure the company’.

‘Those allegations are untrue and there is no evidential basis for them.’

He added that he had managed funds invested in Stobart for more than 10 years.

‘Why I would want to ‘injure’ Stobart, in which I have chosen to invest my investors’ funds, is never explained, as is the allegation that I conspired with Andrew Tinkler to pursue his interests over those of Stobart.’

‘I owe duties to the funds I manage, and it is in the best interests of these funds for Stobart to be as successful as possible.’ Woodford said.

Woodford said he had ‘consistently held the belief’ that retaining Tinkler on the Stobart board was in the company’s best interests and those of investment funds he managed.

He added that in his view, Tinkler was the ‘entrepreneurial brains’ behind Stobart and a ‘value creator’.

The trial continues. 

Your first trade for Wednesday, March 28

0
show chapters

Your first trade for Wednesday, March 28

“Fast Money” final trades: GLD, RHT and more   

The “Fast Money” traders shared their first moves for the market open.

 

Tim Seymour was a buyer of General Motors.

David Seaburg was a buyer of Alphabet.

The cheapest and best index tracker funds and ETFs

0

Tracker and index funds offer simple low cost investing, where you ditch the costs and risks of trying to beat the market and follow it instead.

They are ideal for those who want to invest but don’t want the hassle of picking shares and want to avoid the often hefty costs using a traditional active fund manager involves. 

Index funds can keep costs ultra-low and while they won’t beat the market neither should they fall far behind it – the idea instead is that what has been called passive investing is a slow and steady method wins the race.

So if you are thinking why should you pay for a fund manager’s Porsche when you can get cheaper investing – and often better than average performance – by just following an index, we take a look at some of the cheapest index trackers and how to invest.

Even the world’s most famous investor Warren Buffett has advocated trackers – stating that the instructions on the estate he will leave for his wife is to put it 90% into index funds

Beware fees and tracking error

There is little point in deciding to invest through index funds and then opting for one that carries high fees, so whatever you do check the costs.

Another drawback to trackers is ‘tracking error’. This is where a tracker fails to accurately follow the index. It is normally only marginal but some funds can drift wider over longer time spans.

Those with the highest charges often have the worst tracking error: the effect of fees makes it impossible to keep up.

Another danger is that simple index funds hold companies proportionally to their size. Sometimes companies and sectors become huge, making up a big chunk of a stock market – leaving tracker investors highly exposed to individual stocks or sectors, as happened with banks in 2007. 

The best and cheapest tracker funds and ETFs

Below, we list some of the UK’s cheapest low-cost list the cheapest passive funds across investors’ most popular sectors including UK, UK Government bonds (Gilts), global, US, Europe-ex-UK and Japan, highlighting each one’s ongoing charges.

The ongoing charge is a better indication of the real cost than the annual management fee, taking all administration and dealing charges into account. 

But you also need to consider the overall cost of investing, which includes any dealing fees and platform charges.

For more information, read our guide on how to choose the best (and cheapest) DIY investing Isa.  

Mutual index funds versus ETFs

The list features the cheapest traditional passive mutual funds as well as exchange traded funds (ETFs). Both are very low cost compared to active funds where the fund manager picks investments with the aim of trumping a market index.

The main difference between the two passive types is that ETFs are listed on stock exchanges and therefore trade throughout the day like a common stock; a mutual fund has its net asset value calculated once at the end of every day and can only be bought then.

This means ETFs have greater flexibility – or are more liquid in investment terms – but choosing these over a passive mutual fund won’t really make much of a difference if you do not buy and sell investments often.

Trackers may be cheaper to buy and sell compared with ETFs if you can find a platform that doesn’t charge for fund dealing, as ETFs usually incur a share dealing charge. 

It is also worth mentioning that some brokers have secured discount prices for certain funds, so it is worth having a look across the different investment platforms for the cheapest deals.

UK – FTSE 100 

Cheapest index tracker: Vanguard FTSE 100 Index: 0.06 per cent ongoing charge.

Cheapest ETF: iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF and HSBC FTSE 100. 0.07 per cent ongoing charge. 

UK – All Share

Cheapest index tracker: iShares UK Equity Index, Fidelity Index UK: 0.06 per cent ongoing charge.

Cheapest ETF: SSGA – SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF: 0.2 per cent ongoing charge.

UK – Gilts

Cheapest index fund: Legal & General All Stocks Gilt Index Trust (tracks the FTSE Actuaries British Government Index- Linked All Stocks index), Vanguard UK Government Bond Index (tracks the Barclays Capital Global Aggregate U.K. Government Bond index): 0.15 per cent ongoing charge.

Cheapest ETF: Vanguard – UK Gilt UCITS ETF (tracks the Bloomberg Barclays Sterling Gilt Float Adjusted index): 0.12 per cent ongoing charge. 

Global

Cheapest index fund: The L&G International Index Trust and Fidelity Index World tracks the FTSE World ex UK and MSCI World indices respectively. Both indexes invest in stocks from developed countries (the former excludes UK). Both funds levy an ongoing charge of 0.13 per cent.  

Cheapest ETF: Vanguard FTSE All World UCITS ETF is the cheapest fund investing in the broadest possible basket of the world’s stock markets comprising of shares from both developed and developing economies. The funds ongoing charges is 0.25 per cent.

US- S&P 500 

Cheapest index fund: Fidelity Index US and HSBC American Index: 0.06 per cent ongoing charge.

Cheapest ETF: Source S&P 500: 0.05 per cent ongoing charge. 

Emerging Markets

Cheapest index fund: Fidelity Emerging Markets Index (tracks MSCI Emerging Markets index): 0.2 per cent ongoing charge. 

Cheapest ETF: Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF: 0.2 per cent ongoing charges. 

Europe – ex UK 

Cheapest index fund:  iShares Continental European Equity Index (tracks FTSE World Europe ex UK): 0.09 per cent ongoing charge.

Cheapest ETF: The cheapest tracker in this category are the HSBC Euro Stoxx 50 UCITS ETF and Source Euro Stoxx 50 UCITS ETF with an ongoing charge of 0.05 per cent, but it only tracks the performance of 50 large, blue-chip European companies operating within Eurozone nations.

The Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe ex UK UCITS ETF, tracks a broader range of European stocks. It levies an ongoing charge of 0.12 per cent.  

Japan 

Cheapest index fund: Fidelity Index Japan (tracks the MSCI Japan index): 0.1 per cent ongoing charge.

Cheapest ETF: Amundi JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF: 0.18 per cent ongoing charge. 

 

Funds that do it all for you

Vanguard offers a range of LifeStrategy portfolios that put your money into a range of index funds and bonds from around the world.

These can be 100 per shares from around the world, or step down in a mixture of shares and bonds from 80 per cent shares / 20 per cent bonds to 20 per cent shares / 80 per cent bonds.

The ongoing charges figure is 0.24 per cent

> The Minor Investor column on how the LifeStrategy works. 

Tracker funds and efficient markets 

Tracking is far more effective in ‘efficient’ markets, such as larger companies in the UK and the US.

In countries such as these, financial systems ensure that everything investors need to know is in the public domain and well reported.

There are also big investing industries generating huge amounts of research on the biggest companies and employing a small army of people trying to profit from their shares.

Therefore, it is harder for a fund manager to seek out bargain stocks that have been overlooked and he or she will struggle to beat the index.

But in less efficient markets, such as emerging markets and Asia, or niche areas like smaller companies, stock-picking fund managers find it easier hunt out gems and therefore find it easier to beat trackers.You still need to spend some time picking a good manager though.

Shares of a company that trafficked in personal Facebook data swoon

0

 

Shares of a company that trafficked in personal Facebook data swoon

Getty Images

Shares of Acxiom fell by a third Thursday after Facebook ended its partnership with the data broker as result of the social media’s data privacy scandal.

As a result, Acxiom warned 2019 revenue could be hit by as much as $25 million.

There’s only one survivor of this year’s cryptocurrency slaughter: VeChain

0

There's only one survivor of this year's cryptocurrency slaughter: VeChain

Source: VeChain Foundation

All of the top 20 cryptocurrencies by market cap are down for the year. Except for one, VeChain.

 

That digital currency has gained more than 28 percent since January 1, which one analyst says is thanks to big-name partnerships and a unique structure that incentivizes investors not to sell.

Prices of most cryptocurrencies have suffered this year following regulatory crackdowns and news of hacks. For the top three by market cap, bitcoin is down more than 44 percent, ethereum has fallen 40 percent, and ripple is down 74 percent this year, according to data from CoinMarketCap.

Buy the dip looks dead as final hour of trading now typically sees selling

0
show chapters

Buy the dip looks dead as final hour of trading now typically sees selling

‘Buy the dip’ looks dead, as final hour of trading now typically sees selling   

Buying on the dip seems out of style in the U.S. stock market, as traders are typically dumping stocks right before the close, according to data from Bespoke Investment Group.

 

“The YTD [year-to-date] pattern has been a very big spike at the open towards highs of the day between 10:00 and 11:00 AM,” Bespoke said in a note Friday. “There are bouts of volatility back and forth, but the biggest swing lower comes in at the end of day trade right before the close.”

Buy the dip looks dead as final hour of trading now typically sees selling

How to build a Junior Isa fit for a prince or princess 

0

Having just returned to work following a year’s maternity leave – and in the week a Royal pregnancy has been announced – what could be more fitting than writing an article on the best way to open a Junior Isa?

My son has just turned one and my husband and I would like to use his birthday money to open an investment account for him. 

We may have a smaller amount to open the account with than the Cambridges but over the course of the next 18 years or so, we’d like to build up a fund that not even a little prince or princess would sniff at. Perhaps it’ll help him out with university costs or buying a home.

Growth potential: perhaps your money will grow enough for you to help your child buy a home

There is a big fund, investment trust and shares universe that you can put into your DIY stocks and shares Junior Isa. Remember that you are investing for your child rather than yourself so your investment style and horizon may be different.

When considering a platform for your Junior Isa you need to consider the same things as when picking an adult one. Think about both service and charges. Compare a few providers on administration fees, investment funds charges, fund and share dealing costs, regular investing charges and any other fees.

If you plan to regularly invest for your child make sure the cost of doing this is as low as possible. There are two main ways of doing this; either discounted regular monthly investment, for which platforms often charge around £1.50, or using a platform that offers free fund dealing.

Read our guide to the top DIY investing platforms and what they charge.

See the table below for a list of providers and a summary of their investment range, set-up costs and minimum contributions.

A selection of stocks and shares Junior Isa providers 
Provider
 
Investment choice Fees

Minimum contribution Notes
 
One Family  Choice of two funds – Family Balanced International Fund and Family Charities Ethical Trust  Annual management charge of 1.5% of the value of the fund. Other annual expenses of approximately 0.2% of the value of the fund are also deducted. 

£10 per month

Open a OneFamily Junior ISA online and set up a monthly Direct Debit of £20 or more and you’ll get a £30 Amazon e-voucher.

Scottish Friendly  Choice of eight funds – from low to high risk

Annual management fee for the Scottish Friendly My Select Junior ISA is 1.5%.

£10 per month, £50 lump sum

 

When you take out a My Select Junior Isa we’ll pay £50 into the Junior ISA for your child (which will be deducted if you transfer to another provider within the first five years)
Hargreaves Lansdown  Very wide selection, including funds, shares and investment trusts  No set-up or transfer-in charges. No charges to buy or sell funds. Annual charge of 0.45% to hold funds and shares (capped at £45 for shares). Online share dealing from £5.95 per deal. 

£100 lump sum of £25 per month 

FREE Pedro the Penguin money box when you open or transfer to our Junior ISA 

Chelsea Financial Services  Three ready-made portfolios or access to more than more than 2,500 funds 0% service charge for the next 12 months so investors only pay the fund management charges. 0% switching fees when you move money between funds.

£25 per month or £50 lump sum 

 
AJ Bell  Shares, funds, investment trusts and ETFs 

Include an annual custody charge of 0.25 per cent for funds and shares (limited to £5 per quarter for shares) and trading fees of £1.50 for funds and £9.95 for shares (reduced to £4.95 if there were more than 10 share trades in the previous month)  £25 per month

 

 

What to invest in: Expert strategy tips

Jeannie Boyle, a chartered financial planner and director of wealth manager EQ Investors, says: ‘In most cases an investment for a child implies a long timescale, ideal for adopting an adventurous investment strategy, where you accept the greater volatility that comes with the potential for greater returns in the long term.

‘This all suggests that a child’s portfolio should be invested largely in equities (shares) and property, since these are the types of assets that historically have produced the highest returns over the long term.’ 

Funds are the easy way to invest. You will be pooling your money with other investors to be invested across a range of assets, which can include shares, bonds, property or other investments. If they are ‘actively managed’, an investment manager will decide what to invest in. If they are ‘passive’, they’ll track an index, such as the FTSE 250.

WHAT ABOUT PENSIONS FOR KIDS? 

Another investment opportunity that could provide a sizeable sum for a child’s very long-term future is a pension. They can be opened by parents or grandparents and contributed to from as soon as the child is born but can’t be accessed until the age of 65. Up to £3,600 a year can be paid in, or £300 a month, and as the government automatically tops up payments by 20 per cent, you only need to contribute £2,880 to reach the £3,600 annual limit.

There are two main versions of pensions for kids – a stakeholder pension or a junior self invested personal pension (Sipp). With the first, an investment manager chooses what to use your money to back and you pay for their services. With the cheaper latter option, you’re in charge and you’ll have a far greater range of investment options but you’ll have to shoulder the full burden of stock selection and be prepared to take the risk that entails.

Fidelity International’s analysis shows if you were to invest £300 a month into a Sipp for the first 18 years of your child’s life, they would end up with a very impressive £567,258 pension at the age of 65 even if they didn’t make further contributions during their adult life.

All funds will have a stated aim, and depending on what they invest in and how they do it, they will be more or less risky. 

Juliet Schooling Latter, research director at Chelsea Financial Services – who invests in a Junior Isa for her stepsons – has some specific fund picks based on the experience of Chelsea’s clients.

She says: ‘We’ve generally found that, among our client base at least, people are willing to take a bit more risk with Junior Isa investments than they are adult Isas. This may be because they see the time horizon being longer (a full 18 years in most cases), or it’s not savings core to their own future/retirement – it’s a ‘nice extra’ for children. Whatever the reason, we see most money going into global and emerging market equity funds.

‘Another trend we see is that people like investing in areas that will capture the imagination of their older children, so they can talk to them about it without eyes glazing over!’  

Get an investing Plan B to protect against a market crash

0

This year established stock markets have continued to soar to new record highs or thereabouts – stretching valuations as they tick higher.

But history teaches us that bull runs never last forever and eventually markets will plunge into a bear territory, or even worse face a full-on crash. 

When exactly this will happen is anyone’s guess, so unless you have a fully functioning crystal ball, having a contingency plan is good practice.

This Plan B is the thing that will support you when it feels as if the bad days just won’t stop coming. Here, we explore how you can shield your portfolio against devastating financial losses.

Before triggering your plan B, you need to be clear on whether their portfolio is doing badly because markets are down, or because you have picked poor investments

A solid plan A is a good plan B 

For Ben Kumar, investment manager at Seven Investment Management, having a range of funds investing across different asset classes in the portfolios he manages means he is hedged against market downturns.

He said the results of numerous stress tests on the portfolios run by the wealth manager revealed that should the FTSE 100 fall by between 15 and 20 per cent, they would only capture between 4 and 8 per cent of the downturn – because of diversification.

To further shield his portfolios from adverse market conditions, Kumar said he has purchased put options – where an option to sell assets at an agreed price on or before a specified date – because they have been cheap to buy in recent history.

He said ‘You don’t need a plan B if your plan A is up to scratch.

‘If you are a long term investor, you do not need to worry about short term movements.

‘Sticking to your plans and not tinkering with your portfolio with ever movement in the markets is actually quite important. 

‘The danger with having a hard trigger finger is markets are not efficient, so there are occasions where they will move violently one way then snap back. The reactions of the UK markets following the Brexit vote is a good example of this. 

‘It is about knowing what your investment goals are, what your time horizon is and your appetite to risk. This should be at the forefront of any investor’s mind.’

How investors can protect against a market crash

It’s been a decent year for investors and major stock markets around the world are trading near record highs.

Things may continue to go up, but it always pays to have a Plan B just in case shares take a tumble.

Simon Lambert, of This is Money, explains how you can build a disaster plan into your portfolio.

Press play to listen or listen (and please subscribe if you like the podcast) at iTunes, Acast and Audioboom or visit our This is Money Podcast page.    

 

I’ll come good, says Invesco’s Mark Barnett as he is judged 84th of 85

0

One of the country’s top fund managers, dubbed by some financial experts as ‘son of Neil Woodford’, insists his ‘well-tested investment process’ will eventually come good.

The claim, made by Mark Barnett of major investment house Invesco, comes as the latest performance statistics show he is delivering returns for fund investors way below those of all his immediate rivals bar Woodford.

Barnett replaced Woodford as head of UK equities at Invesco in early 2014 after the latter set up his own investment group. He now manages Invesco Income and High Income, the two multi-billion pound funds previously run by Woodford, as well as two other UK-focused funds and investment trusts Edinburgh and Perpetual Income & Growth.

Others describe him more cruelly as the ‘David Moyes’ of Invesco, as big a let-down as Moyes was when given the job of succeeding Sir Alex Ferguson at Manchester United.

Patrick Connolly, a chartered financial planner with Chase de Vere, continues to hold Invesco Income and High Income for clients. But he has not recommended the funds for more than a year. 

He says: ‘Barnett has underperformed significantly. This is for a number of reasons including a focus on domestic UK companies that have been hurt by a weak sterling.’

Free investing guides

On Friday, Invesco acknowledged that Barnett’s underperformance had resulted from the funds’ exposure to sterling and UK-sourced revenues, a refusal to invest in mining companies (which had performed strongly), and ‘isolated stock challenges’.

But it remains convinced the most compelling investment opportunities within the UK stock market are be found in the domestic sectors that Barnett’s funds are heavily exposed to. 

It added: ‘Mr Barnett continues to evaluate and re-evaluate the holdings in the funds, seeking the best opportunities to create a sustainable flow of dividend income. He believes at a time of irrational market pricing, it is vital he remains rooted to his investment strategy.’

The rise in popularity of passive funds could be a blessing in disguise for stock-pickers

0

Passive investment products of various types have seen a rise in popularity over recent years thanks to a combination of booming stock markets since 2009 and falling fees.

With exposure to the main share indices such as the FTSE 100 and many others being available to investors for as little as 7 basis points (0.07 per cent), more and more people have been putting a larger chunk of their investment pot into them.

Passive funds represented 27 per cent of total funds invested worldwide in 2017, up from just 16 per cent in 2010.

City fund managers are under more pressure to outperform than they used to be thanks to passive products’ rising popularity and lower fees

The other side of this coin is that it has eaten into the amount of money being put into actively managed funds run by stock-pickers, and is forcing them to lower fees, which in most cases still remain at least ten times higher than the cheapest passives.

On the face of it, this ongoing development in the investment marketplace is bad news for stock-pickers and the firms that employ them.

There is another side to this however, that means an increased market share for passive funds could bring some benefits to active management firms, and ultimately to investors.

French investment firm Lyxor has sponsored some research into the impact the rise of passive funds is having on the stock market. The paper produced by academics at Paris-Dauphine University is titled ‘What role has passive management left for active?’

It examines whether the increasing market share of passives will generate inefficiencies for stock-pickers over on the active management side to exploit.

RELATED ARTICLES

Previous
1
Next


Massive £822.5m launch for Terry Smith’s new investment…


Should you sink your teeth into the Faang shares as they…


The US is expensive and the UK is unloved, so it’s time to…


Shareholder heroes: The FTSE 100 companies that raised…

Share this article

Share

One of its central conclusions is that the increased role of index-based investing is in fact ‘more an opportunity than a threat for active managers.’

There is an important caveat. This being that it is only a good thing for active managers that generate alpha, or in other words do what they are supposed to do and beat the relevant share index. 

According to the research, benefits stem from active funds that do not generate consistent alpha increasingly being forced out of the market, leaving more money to go into the ones that are performing.

Those undershooting the market consistently while charging ten times as much as a tracker have less and less chance to get away with it. This helps reward fund firms that have genuinely good products, and is good news for investors as they will be less likely to end up in dud funds. 

Free investing guides

As well as this broad brush benefit to the investment market, there are some specific benefits to stock pickers that are left in the game still. 

The Paris-Dauphine researchers found evidence to suggest increased benchmarking reduces the number of shares in investors’ portfolios that are ‘sensitive to private information’, and limits investors’ willingness to speculate.

That is to say the higher passive market share means there are less investors of all kinds seeking out stock specific information to act on, the paper explains. Fewer people are trying to ‘beat the market’ in the first place.

This means so-called ‘informational efficiency’ declines in the stock market – the measure of how equally relevant knowledge is spread among all participants in the given market.

Given that outperforming the market – generating alpha – depends in large part on there being unequal information among market participants, this creates greater opportunity for fund managers to outperform their benchmark index.

In turn, if this holds true it means that over time investors who put money into the active funds left still in business are more likely to be getting what they paid for.

UK shares to back for a Brexit agreement bounce… or deadlock

0

Brexit has given UK investors a lot of food for thought. While the pound dropped after the referendum, as traders tried to digest what leaving the EU would mean for the economy, the effect on the stock market has been more subtle.

The FTSE 100 index fell sharply in the aftermath of the 2016 vote, but recovered to hit a record high in May.

Although it has fallen 10 per cent since then, it is still 12 per cent above where it was before the referendum. 

Likewise the FTSE 250 has slumped 13 per cent since its high in June this year as Brexit crept closer, but is 9 per cent higher than it was before the vote.

Yet the generally positive performance masks differences between the sectors. 

Whole industries have seen their shares depressed amid fears that any type of Brexit could shake the UK economy. 

Cutting ties with continental Europe could stunt economic growth, so the argument goes, making consumers less willing to spend.

Big High Street banks have also struggled to buck up their shares for similar reasons, as they are largely at the whim of consumers and businesses.

With political turmoil gripping Westminster, as MPs debate whether to back Theresa May’s withdrawal deal, many investors are wondering what to do.

RELATED ARTICLES

Previous
1
2
Next


Brexit Plan B: How are supermarkets preparing for a ‘no…


Drowning our sorrows: Pub group Greene King says it’s making…


The Santa Rally is real: Investors banking on a December…


MINOR INVESTOR: Where can you invest with protection?


Rise of passive funds could be a blessing in disguise for…

Share this article

Share

HOW THIS IS MONEY CAN HELP

How to choose the best (and cheapest) DIY investing Isa – and our pick of the platforms

In the event of a no-deal Brexit, when all economic fears would be amplified and the pound could plunge, big international companies which make chunks of their earnings in other currencies are buffered on two counts.

Firstly, they are less dependent on the UK consumer, and secondly, if the pound falls, this would make their foreign earnings more valuable when converted back into sterling.

Danny Cox, of Hargreaves Lansdown, says stocks such as drugs giant Glaxosmithkline, oil firm BP and Marmite-maker Unilever should be reliable in the event of a no-deal Brexit.

Patrick Thomas, investment manager at Canaccord Genuity Wealth Management, recommends funds such as Scottish Mortgage Trust or Polar Capital Healthcare. 

Both have international exposure and are focused on tech and healthcare respectively – areas which are likely to keep growing regardless of Brexit.

Steve Davies, manager of the Jupiter UK Growth Fund, has also been reducing exposure to domestically focused stocks and ploughing it back into international businesses.

Davies emphasises that he hasn’t sold any of his bread-and-butter UK companies entirely. In fact, he believes their fundamentals to be strong, but that adding diversity is prudent.

Poll

Are UK shares a value opportunity?

Yes

240 votes

No

70 votes

Now share your opinion

    

James Klempster, head of investment management at Momentum, is wary of trying to predict politics. But though he too has been weighting towards overseas-focused companies, he believes many UK firms are looking strong beneath the sterling risks.

Indeed if a Brexit deal is agreed, the same companies which have taken a battering could see shares shoot up.

Firms such as Lloyds Bank, Taylor Wimpey and brick maker Ibstock could be good bets for investors confident of a more orderly Brexit, Cox says.

For anyone who is completely negative on their outlook, Thomas suggests the so-called absolute return sector of investment funds.

Options such as the Personal Assets Trust and Ruffer Total Return can hold assets like gold and currencies, and though they tend to be on the back foot when markets are rising, volatility and uncertainty is often their friend.

FTSE 100 shares that raised dividends every year for a decade

0

Companies that pay a regular dividend and increase their share price consistently  each year are the ultimate win for investors.

Not only do they provide income, if you reinvest this then your money can benefit from the power of compounding to the absolute maximum.

And a selection of FTSE 100 companies have fulfilled investors’ hopes and more over the past decade, with 15 of them having not only raised dividends every year for ten years but also delivered total returns of more than 500 per cent.

Top of the pile is the astonishing performance of Ashtead, with a stunning total return over ten years of 5,399 per cent. 

A total of 27 FTSE 100 firms have increased their dividends every year for at least the past 10 years, but only 15 have also handed investors a return of more than 500 per cent

Analysis undertaken by online investment platform AJ Bell has revealed that just 27 firms in the FTSE 100 increased their dividend every year for at least the past 10 years.

Of these, 15 have increased their dividends every year for the past decade and delivered a return in excess of 500 per cent over that timeframe.

Identifying these stocks ahead of time is the trick, and there’s no guarantee that those which have performed previously will do so again in the future. 

However, it’s still interesting to look at which firms have proven winners in the past. 

RELATED ARTICLES

Previous
1
Next


Britain’s golden nugget investments: The shares that…


THE PRUDENT INVESTOR: I took a 5.5% October haircut as…


How to invest in Britain: From shares that look cheap, to…


I keep hearing about vanadium, a metal whose price has…

Share this article

Share
12 shares

HOW THIS IS MONEY CAN HELP

How to choose the best (and cheapest) DIY investing Isa – and our pick of the platforms

At the top of the list is Ashtead. Based on today’s dividend payout and the share price a decade ago, those who bought shares in the industrial equipment rental company 10 years ago, now earn an annual income equal to 71 per cent of their initial investment.

Overall they would have enjoyed a 5,399 per cent return in that time, turning a £1,000 investment into a staggering £53,990.

Online investment platform Hargreaves Lansdown takes second place, boasting a dividend yield of 18 per cent and a 1,512 per cent growth in share price over the period.

Closely behind in third is Croda, the specialty chemicals firm, which has upped its yield to 16 per cent and returned 1,182 per cent.

These calculations run from October 2008, the month when Lehman Brothers famously failed. Since then the average FTSE 100 listed company has returned 146 per cent since 2008 – the peak of the global financial crisis. 

THE DIVIDEND HERO SHARES 
Company 10-year total return (%) Current yield on 2008 share price (%)
Ashtead 5,399% 71%
Hargreaves Lansdown 1,512% 18%
Croda 1,182% 16%
InterContinental Hotels 1,000% 16%
Halma 815% 8%
DCC 758% 12%
Prudential 695% 17%
Scottish Mortgage 694% 5%
Compass 682% 12%
Paddy Power Betfair 656% 19%
Micro Focus International 641% 31%
Intertek 619% 10%
Whitbread 610% 13%
St. James’s Place 595% 22%
Bunzl 571% 8%
FSTE 100 average   146  – 
Source: AJ Bell     

Russ Mould, investment director at DIY platform AJ Bell, said: ‘If someone said you could invest in something that handed you over four times the growth of the market you’d be pretty happy, but you’d be over the moon with one stock that’s delivered 35 times the return of the FTSE 100 over the past 10 years.

‘That’s exactly what equipment rental company Ashtead has done, turning a £10,000 investment 10 years ago into £539,900 today.’ 

The combination of reinvesting a steady level of income and decent capital growth can deliver massive gains for investors.

An investor who split £100,000 evenly between these 15 companies 10 years ago would now be sitting on a pot of well over £1million today in total return terms.

‘In addition to that, the annual dividend yield on these stocks today based on the purchase price 10 years ago is a whopping 19 per cent, with Ashtead yielding a staggering 71 per cent,’ added Mould.

‘This shows the power of investing for the long term, reinvesting dividends and waiting patiently for the magic of compound interest to shine through.’ 

None of these companies yields anywhere near that much if you buy their shares today. Ashtead, Hargreaves Lansdown and Croda yield 1.74 per cent, 1.67 per cent and 1.66 per cent respectively.

As already stated, past performance is not an indicator of future results, so don’t invest in the stocks mentioned expecting history to repeat itself. 

It is important to scrutinise every investment proposition before taking the plunge.